Page 57 - Flathead Beacon // 2.11.15

FLATHEADBEACON.COM OUTDOORS OUT OF BOUNDS Rob Breeding
Access Remains No. 1 Issue
FEBRUARY 11, 2015 | 57
RESTORE. RENEW. REVITALIZE.
30% OFF ALL 2014 MODELS
2015 MODELS ARRIVING SOON!
RESTORE. RENEW.
RESTORE. RENEW.
SUNRIVER GREENWOOD
REVITALIZE.
QUEEN EURO-TOP QUEEN
REVITALIZE.
REG $1,249 • NOW ONLY REG $700 • NOW ONLY
30% OFF ALL 2014 MODELS
$665 $368
30% OFF ALL 2014 MODELS
2015 MODELS ARRIVING SOON!
2015 MODELS ARRIVING SOON!
SUNRIVER GREENWOOD Always Something Special
SUNRIVER GREENWOOD
QUEEN EURO-TOP QUEEN QUEEN EURO-TOP QUEEN
REG $1,249 • NOW ONLY REG $700 • NOW ONLY REG $1,249 • NOW ONLY REG $700 • NOW ONLY
665 368
$$
665 368
$$
W
WRIGHT’S
6325 Hwy. 93 South
WRIGHT’S
8
6
2
.
2
4
5
5
FURNITURE
862-2455
a
FURNITURE
862-2455
Since 1976
FREE DELIVERY
Since 1976
FREE DELIVERY
Always Something Special!
Always Something Special!
W
6325 Hwy 93 South Whitefish, Montana
6325 Hwy. 93 South
Whitefish, Montana
hi
tefi
sh
,
M
Open 7 days a Week
Open 7 Days A Week
Open 7 Days A Week
FREE DELIVERY
WrightsFurnitureStore.com
WrightsFurnitureStore.com
WrightsFurnitureStore.com
on
tan
TWO PUBLIC ACCESS BILLS have been added to the mix in Helena. I’m not sure of the fate of either proposal, but I’m watching them with great interest. The bills remind me that the “Access War” isn’t going away soon. But access advocates are at least trying to play offense for a change.
Both bills have been introduced in the House of Representatives. HB 304 would increase the fine landowners have to pay for blocking access to a public road from $10 to $500 per day.
The second piece of legislation, HB 286 may be even more provocative. It re- quires that roads remain open to public access during the dispute over its legal status. As things now stand, once the gates and “No Trespassing” signs go up, the public is locked out until the often lengthy legal process plods to a resolu- tion.
Consider what happened in two of the recent fights over access to Montana rivers. On the Bitterroot River public ac- cess was blocked on Mitchell Slough for more than 15 years. And on the Ruby River, despite a resounding victory for the public in the Montana Supreme Court, access to the waterway is still be- ing hashed out.
These are cases involving rivers rather than roads, but the basic princi- ple that the public was long locked out of places it had a legal right to enter is dis- turbing.
I’m all for the bill in spirit. One of the strategies of the anti-access movement is to lock gates first, then delay, delay, de- lay. If not for the grassroots access move- ment in Montana that has risen up in re- sponse to disputes such as the Bitterroot and the Ruby, those delay tactics might have resulted in permanent closures.
A law such as the one proposed by HB 286 would be interesting to watch if it becomes law. Essentially, you’re going to have to have an intermediate body – the bill gives this responsibility to county commissioners – that will determine if the landowner has the right to block ac-
cess. Parties that disagree may still pur- sue their case in court, but the commis- sioners will decide if the gates go up first.
You might think that this will be good for access rights, and in some coun- ties that might be the case. However, the history of county commissioners on ac- cess issues is spotty at best. The commis- sioners in Madison County, for instance, have been overtly hostile to access rights on the Ruby River. I can’t imagine they’d be any better if they were judging a road dispute.
Even if the county commission isn’t the right forum, I like the idea of creat- ing some sort of access arbiter that might be able to head off some of these disputes before they enter the costly and time consuming legal system. Such a system could work for both landowners as well, allowing them to protect their property rights where the evidence seems clear their claim is legitimate. The concept might best be organized at the state level rather than at the counties where deci- sions may be based more on local politics than a fair analysis of the history of pub- lic use on the road in question.
The other bill, HB 304, seems like a no-brainer even if $500 isn’t the cor- rect amount for the proposed fine. If a landowner locks a gate that person has no right to lock, forcing the public into a lengthy legal battle, then that landowner should pay significant fines if the case is resolved against them. If the fine is large enough it may serve as a disincentive for the delay tactic and folks will instead work out reasonable compromises.
I don’t know if either bill has a chance of passage, but I am encouraged by the going-on-the-offensive approach both suggest. Most of the big wins in recent years have been cases where the public fought to regain access to places it lost when unjustified “No Trespassing” signs went up.
New laws should make it harder to deny access and create a path toward reasonable solutions that protect land- owners and the public.
Fat Bike
Headquarters Rentals & Sales
406.257.5808 www.wheatonscycle.com
a
h
s
r
p
e
n
e
w
)
o
o
t
s
l
t
a
(
r
e
n