fbpx

White House, Lawmakers Hail Year-end Deal on Spending, Taxes

Montana lawmakers respond to renewal of land and water conservation fund

By ERICA WERNER & ANDREW TAYLOR, Associated Press

WASHINGTON — The White House and lawmakers of both parties grudgingly embraced a massive government-wide budget deal Wednesday combining more than a trillion dollars in year-end spending with hundreds of billions in tax cuts for businesses, families and special interests of every kind. Leaders planned to push it to final passage by week’s end and quickly adjourn for the holidays, ending a tumultuous year on Capitol Hill.

The sprawling package will keep federal agencies funded through Sept. 30 of next year, staving off a government shutdown that was to begin next Tuesday at midnight under the latest in a series of short-term spending bills, this one passed by Congress and signed by President Barack Obama on Wednesday.

“In divided government, you don’t get everything you want,” new House Speaker Paul Ryan said of the 2,200-page melange of wins and losses for both parties. “I think everybody can point to something that gives them a reason to be in favor of both of these bills.”

At the White House, press secretary Josh Earnest sounded a similar note, saying Obama would sign the package despite elements opposed by the administration. Those include a GOP provision lifting the 40-year-old ban on exporting crude oil from the U.S. and delays and suspensions of several taxes to pay for Obama’s health care law.

“The president is pleased with the final product, even if it does reflect the kind of compromise that’s necessary when you have a Democratic president negotiating with large majorities of Republicans,” Earnest said.

Indeed, few ringing endorsements could be heard from either side for the sprawling package.

Despite pledges by Ryan to run a different kind of House after his predecessor, John Boehner, was ousted byconservatives angered over last-minute, dead-of-night compromises with Democrats, the new GOP speaker found himself asking lawmakers to endorse a huge, eleventh-hour deal of his own. It’s stuffed with special interest goodies, presents for powerful lawmakers and provisions of obscure origin benefiting everyone from race car owners and many others.

He pledged to do better next year. And most Republican lawmakers appeared happy to give him the benefit of the doubt and say goodbye to a roller coaster of a year that included a near-shutdown of the Homeland Security Department and Boehner’s chaotic ouster.

“There’s a whole variety of things in there I define as very positive,” GOP Rep. Frank Lucas of Oklahoma said after emerging from a closed-door meeting where Ryan pitched the deal. “Let the other side spin it however they want. I think the votes come together to pass it, and I get to go to my mother-in-law’s Saturday morning.”

Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called the package “a good compromise.” But House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., was among those expressing outright opposition, arguing that the package of tax breaks estimated to cost $680 billion over the next decade was too heavily weighted toward corporations and “practically an immorality.”

Yet House Democrats’ opposition to the tax package was expected. Republican leaders expressed confidence Pelosi would nonetheless deliver the majority of votes needed to pass the $1.15 trillion spending bill, leaving it to GOP lawmakers to provide the bulk of votes on the tax package under a widely accepted calculus allowing certain numbers of lawmakers to defect on each piece in the House without threatening the overall package.

After years of trying, Republicans claimed wins by making permanent business tax breaks for research and development and for buying new equipment.

Democrats got permanent extensions of tax credits for college costs, children and lower-income families. In exchange for lifting the oil ban they won five-year extensions of solar and wind energy production credits plus a renewal of a land and water conservation fund.

Omitted were two major GOP goals: Language dismantling Obama’s health care law and blocking federal money for Planned Parenthood, which would be certain to draw vetoes. Conservatives were also distressed at the omission of language clamping down on Syrian and Iraqi refugees. Surviving was widely supported language tightening curbs on foreign tourists visiting without visas.

And despite Pelosi’s complaints, other than lifting the oil export ban, Democrats mostly carried the day in keeping the spending bill largely free of controversial policy provisions known as “riders.”

Democrats managed to kick out more than 20 GOP-sponsored riders seeking to roll back Obama administration regulations. Efforts to stall Environmental Protection Agency rules on power plant greenhouse gas emissions, ozone emissions, mine cleanup standards and an expansion of the Clean Water Act were all killed.

Instead, Republicans won a repeat of old victories involving the lead content in fishing tacking and ammunition and language sought by Western interests limiting protection of the sage grouse.

“We do feel good about what we did get and would love to have achieved more,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told The Associated Press. “And it’s going to take a new president of a different party to achieve what we’d like to achieve.”


Montana lawmakers react to reauthorization of LWCF

The omnibus will reauthorize the Land and Water Conservation Fund for three years and increase fiscal year 2016 funding to $450 million.

The LWCF works by collecting royalties from federal off-shore oil leases and makes the money available for matching grants to buy fish and wildlife habitat and increase access for recreation like hunting and fishing. Since its inception, the fund has provided $16 billion for conservation projects, including about $500 million in Montana.

LWCF expired this year for the first time in its 50-year history.

U.S. Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont.

“LWCF remains one of the best ways to increase public access to public lands, and for months I’ve been hearing from Montanans about the importance of permanent reauthorization and full funding. While I’m relieved that LWCF may be revived, this temporary authorization and short-term funding misses the mark in what should have been an easy bullseye.”

U.S. Rep. Ryan Zinke, R-Mont.:

“I’m glad Congress came to their senses and included some form of an LWCF reauthorization and included lifting the ban on crude oil exports, both of these issues I’ve spent a lot of time championing in D.C. because they are important to Montana. But there are a lot of important things that weren’t included, like forest management and regulatory reform.

“There are more than 2,000 pages of the bill that still need to be looked at. The immediate takeaway is, this is no way to govern a nation. We received the text of the bill in the middle of the night with less than 72 hours to read it before votes. The House is far from perfect but we passed most of the appropriations bills last summer well before the deadline, but the Senate Democrats filibustered the bills and shut down the appropriations process. If the funding bills had moved through the Senate in the first place we would not be faced with this artificial funding crisis.”