HELENA — The Montana House Judiciary Committee held a hearing Monday on two bills that would restrict access to abortion in the state, launching a renewed focus for the Republican-controlled Legislature on abortion limits after the state in November elected its first Republican governor in 16 years.
One bill would prohibit abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy. Another one would institute rules about abortion pills and regulate access to them.
Proponents said the measures would protect the health of women seeking abortions and protect unborn fetuses from pain. Opponents said the bills would unconstitutionally limit women’s access to abortion.
“It is unethical to intentionally harm an innocent, immature human being,” said Rep. Lola Sheldon-Galloway, R-Great Falls, sponsor of the bill that would ban abortions after 20 weeks.
If her bill passes, abortions beyond the 20-week pregnancy mark would only be legal to prevent serious health risks to the mothers.
In those cases, medical providers would be required to attempt to ensure that the fetus survives. Medical providers who violate the law could be convicted of a felony.
Laurel Hesse, legislative program manager with the ACLU of Montana, said the bill could violate the right to privacy guaranteed by the Montana Constitution. Similar abortion limitations passed in Arizona and Idaho were struck down in federal court, Hesse said.
Another bill would require that abortion pills be administered by a physician.
Abortion pills can currently be prescribed in Montana through telehealth services, and in some cases can be mailed to patients.
Martha Stahl, president of Planned Parenthood of Montana, told the committee that patients must have conversations with their health care providers before receiving prescriptions for the medication.
Stahl called abortion pills “one of the safest interventions in modern medicine.” But proponents of the bill claimed that abortion pills are dangerous for women seeking abortions.
Rep. Sharon Greef, R-Florence, said her bill was not trying to ban abortions, but “is just basically a bill to protect women.”
Opponents said the bill would also make it difficult for low-income or rural women to get abortions.
The House Judiciary Committee is set to hold hearings on two more abortion-related bills on Wednesday.
One would require women to view an ultrasound of the fetus prior to terminating pregnancy and another would require health care providers to care for infants born alive during abortions.
The committee is set to vote Friday on whether to advance the bills to the House floor.
Stay Connected with the Daily Roundup.
Sign up for our newsletter and get the best of the Beacon delivered every day to your inbox.