Anatomy of a Smear

I urged a fair and public trial instead of the backroom deal we got

Flathead Beacon columnist Dave Skinner has no evidence to back up his smears against me and others (April 6: “The Aryan Invasion”) involved in the production of the Investigation Discovery documentary “Hate in America: A Town on Fire.”

Skinner levels three charges, which are so serious that you’d think he would have facts to back them up. But he doesn’t.

Although Skinner hasn’t seen the film, he claims that it presents a “slanted view” that Kalispell is “in the throes of an Aryan invasion leading to a fascist, racist takeover of society.” That is as silly as it is false.

In fact, Emmy-winning journalist and former CNN anchor Tony Harris, who hosts the documentary, states that “most Flathead residents do not sign onto extremist views. Those belong to a small but vocal minority in an otherwise stunning and welcoming part of America.” And I wrote in The Huffington Post before the documentary aired on March 24 that the “the liberty-loving people” of the Flathead Valley “should not all be judged by a few white supremacists like David Lenio or by the head-scratching actions (or inactions) of prosecutor Ed Corrigan and Judge Heidi Ulbricht.”

Contrary to Skinner’s claims, I have never had a financial motive or benefit for my involvement. In fact, I have acted only as a concerned dad and a concerned citizen from the time I reported Lenio’s threats to shoot grade school kids like “sitting ducks,” “put two in the head of a rabbi,” and keep shooting “until cops take me out, too.”

There has been a lot of back-and-forth about the details of this case and key facts have been garbled in all the spin. But let’s be clear about the stakes. On December 30, 2014, the day that Lenio moved from Grand Rapids, Michigan to Kalispell, he tweeted that he wanted to go on a Sandy Hook-style shooting spree “in a Kalispell, MT, elementary school.”

Finally, Skinner claims that I and other human rights activists sought a free speech-intimidating “show trial.” But anyone who can Google can learn that, in fact, I am a free speech advocate who has praised Lenio’s defense attorney and affirmed Lenio’s right to free speech, a zealous defense, and his presumption of innocence. Before the documentary aired, I wrote in the aforementioned Huffington Post page-one piece that Skinner somehow managed to miss, “Everyone accused of a crime is presumed innocent until proven guilty and is entitled to nothing less.”

The First Amendment protects unpopular, crude, and controversial speech. But it does not protect such speech acts as libel, defamation, false advertising, extortion, and true threats of violence that would make a reasonable person fear for their safety.

The undisputed fact is the day after I reported Lenio’s threats, he retrieved rifles and ammunition from his storage locker. He also had a loaded semi-automatic handgun with him in his van at the time of his arrest – along with extra ammo and jugs of urine. I urged a fair and public trial instead of the backroom deal we got.

Jonathan Hutson lives in Gambrills, Maryland.

  • MissLily

    Skinner likes to throw stinky brown stuff and hope it sticks somewhere, and it usually does-all over his hands.

  • FourisOn

    Hutson, it’s possible that you saved a school. It’s possible that you didn’t. We will never know. What we do know is that you aligned yourself with the most odious crew of nation wreckers since Lenin’s boys, so forgive us if we’re not doing backflips with praise.

    America’s schools are now more than 1/2 non-white. Whites have done next to nothing as our nation’s genocide is more than 1/2 complete. We have welcomed everyone. To align yourself with those who call us “hateful” for saying enough is enough at this late date is rank evil. To expect to be applauded for so doing is the kind of borderline insanity I’m sure is considered par for the course in DC. But here it should get you painted with the same broad brush you used.

    Lay down with dogs, get up with fleas.

    • Rhett the Butler

      Our resident racist, anti-Semitic white supremacyst has spoken. I expect he’s implored his fellow curs to arrive in support.

      • FourisOn

        No, I work alone. Good to see you though.

        • Rhett the Butler

          That you can’t get along with your own kind comes as no surprise.

          • FourisOn

            No, I get along with everyone. But when I argue, I prefer to argue alone.

          • Rhett the Butler

            See what happens when you listen to the voices in your head?

  • Rhett the Butler

    Skinner and facts are not acquainted with each other.

  • Dave_Skinner

    Well, I don’t have cable or the ID channel, so neither I nor anyone else has actually SEEN the documentary, except for the teaser clip, which “represents” the guns being taken from storage. But neither prop gun actually matched the “guilty” weapons. According to multiple reports, Lenio had a Mosin and a Hi Point — the “documentary” props were an AR-15, which just HAPPENS to be the bete noir of the anti gun crowd, and what looks like a Mauser, but the Evil Black Rifle AR 15 was lovingly photographed.

    Sorry, but I’m a gun guy, at least in part thanks to decades of lousy firearms-related “journalism,” where reporters get the details wrong and wronger. Both Armalites and Mausers are fundamentally as well as cosmetically different and should not have been used as props here. Never mind that at least one of the actual guns was BROKEN, no sign of that in the clip, either.

    So if there is THAT much artistic license in just one minute of the “documentary,” what about the rest, which is STILL not viewable to non-cable? Ah well, the less people watching, the better.
    As for the free speech part of this, Mr. Hutson has fully exercised his right, with thousands of words in multiple essays much longer than my allocated word count. His output has given him plenty of material from which to cherry pick, with multiple links, as I would expect a “communications” professional to do. Ain’t America great?

    My concern, which still stands, and is shared by many, is that the governing “hate speech” or “intimidation” statutes are badly written and constitutionally questionable, meaning a conviction in this matter based upon those statutes might have very well harmed our larger, fundamental right to say stupid stuff — perhaps to the point where it might not be legal for ANYONE to say what needs to be said.
    That’s a legitmate concern, which I staunchly believe defense counsel Brent Getty, county attorney Ed Corrigan, and Judge Heidi Ulbricht considered very carefully as they worked their way through this morass. I support their decisions.

  • dee

    David Lenio made very serious threats, and thankfully was grabbed before anything happened. So many times people are seen approaching the edge, and no one says, or does anything.
    I am a HUGE free speech advocate, but this is not what it is supposed to protect. At the very least, he is mentally unstable. He could have very well carried out his threats. Good job for stopping this!!

  • Hamm Barrett

    This afternoon I watched the video ‘Hate In America – A Town On Fire,’ and it left a pretty sleazy impression about the producers. I found myself asking why they were trying to associate the Pioneer Little Europe community of Kalispell with every non-PLE terrorist that crossed their minds. And was it really so clever to go to the extreme of actually fabricating a misspelt word when showing the cover of ‘The Pioneer Little Europe Prospectus,’ when the original has been in public view at Amazon Services for years without such an entertaining distraction?