fbpx

2016 Election: House District 7

Republican incumbent Frank Garner takes on Democrat Lynn Stanley

By Beacon Staff
House District 7 candidates Lynn Stanley, left, and Frank Garner. Courtesy Photos

The Questions:

1. Are infrastructure improvements a major concern for Montana and, if so, what would you do to help pass a comprehensive infrastructure package?

2. Montanans rely on extraction-based industries for jobs, even as demand grows for clean and renewable energy in the region. How would you help employees in the coal, oil and natural gas industries maintain their livelihood, or pursue training in other fields in Montana’s changing economic landscape?

3. Given that the Legislative Fiscal Division has projected an ending fund balance that is considerably less than what was anticipated, what would be your budgetary approach heading into the session?

4. Should the state of Montana push to take more control of some federal land management?

5. What do you think is the most pressing issue facing the 2017 Legislature, and how do you propose dealing with it?


Lynn Stanley 

Residence: Kalispell
Political Party: Democrat
Family: 1 daughter, 1 granddaughter
Occupation: Retired from a 40-year career in the publishing business; all 40 years spent at Oxford University Press USA
Education: B.A. 1970 from Rocky Mountain College, Billings
Political Experience: Chairperson, Flathead Democratic Party
Website: www.LynnStanleyHD7.com and on Facebook

1. The Legislature definitely needs to make infrastructure a priority in the next session. Infrastructure needs are important to everybody who lives here, and good infrastructure is also a draw for companies that want to relocate to Montana. Maintaining infrastructure is an ongoing need, and the further behind we get, the more expensive it is to catch up. With interest rates at a historic low, and with a projected revenue shortfall, I would support funding this with a combination of bonding and cash, perhaps adding more bonding to the mix.

2. Even as clean and renewable energy sources come into play, fossil fuels are not going to disappear from the mix. Already, surface coal mining operates with fewer people than in decades past. This transition will take place over several decades, and there will be time for workers to make the adjustment. The state’s role will be to support our community colleges in offering retraining programs relevant to community needs; to help those counties affected by this transition as they experience the impacts; and to make sure that workers’ pensions and benefits are protected.

3. I think the Legislature ought to keep an open mind and watch carefully what the next few months bring in terms of revenues. I will not be looking for excuses to make cuts, and I would be skeptical of proposals to increase taxes. However, the state is required by our constitution to live within its means, so if necessary, we may be making difficult decisions about ways to tighten the belt. But I think Montana’s economy and the management of government spending has been healthy — Governor Bullock has been doing a good job. For me, the issue will be finding a balance, and supporting fiscally responsible solutions.

4. I do not believe we have anything to gain in Montana from transferring management of federal lands to the state. This would require a much bigger land management bureaucracy than we have now, plus bearing the cost of fires, floods and other mishaps. I believe we would end up with an added burden for taxpayers and the prospect of having to sell off some of these lands to pay the bill for caring for the rest. Montanans overwhelmingly want to keep public lands in public hands, and expect their representatives to protect that access, which would be jeopardized by privatization and development.

5. Montana needs to respond vigorously to efforts to commodify our water. This is, after all, water that belongs to all of us, and we need more scrutiny of proposals to withdraw and privatize it. We could put a cap on yearly extraction from a given well. We could add a resource severance tax as we do with other resources. We could make sure developers take responsibility for road and transportation impacts. And we could tighten up DNRC and DEQ regulations, providing these agencies the resources to probe impacts more deeply. We should also look at what other states are doing as they face the same challenge.


Frank Garner 

Residence: Kila
Political Party: Republican
Family: Married 36 years, three grown children
Occupation: Chief of Security, Kalispell Regional Healthcare
Education: Flathead High School, Flathead Valley Community College graduate
Political Experience: Montana House of Representatives, 2015 to present
Website: frankgarner.org

1. Yes. Infrastructure continues to be a major area of concern. Montana has failed to produce a major infrastructure bill for the past few sessions when the state enjoyed large surpluses. The failure of the Legislature and the governor to agree on a bill has not helped improve our aging roads, bridges or water systems. Last session, a compromise bill failed by one vote in the House. Bonding and the types of projects continue to be roadblocks. We must find common ground in a year where budgets will be much tighter.

2. I would continue to pursue responsible development and use of our current coal, oil and natural gas supplies. The benefits of using our own carbon-based energy resources far outweigh importing them from foreign sources. I would use a percentage of the state revenues from those resources to pursue development of alternate energy resources and to pay for training and educating the workforce needed for alternate energy development. We should be adding jobs, not subtracting them.

3. We will need to make responsible projections for the ending fund balance and budget towards what we know we will have. We need to get the cart in front of the horse. We should not produce a budget that feels good and then look for more money to fill in the blanks. We will need to look for ways to diversify funding in the future as income tax has become an increasingly large part of the overall budget pie.

4. I would much rather talk to someone in our local grocery store about the use of our lands than someone from another state who can’t find the Flathead on a map. Before we could assume that responsibility at a state level, I would need to have the assurance that they would always remain public lands and that we closely study the actual costs and benefits.

5. There are many pressing issues. The budget, infrastructure, public safety, education, jobs and the needs of our aging population are among the many. Also among the most pressing issues is the strain on our resources and the human costs that are associated with drug abuse and related crime. The National Institute on Drug Abuse estimates that the cost to our country in loss productivity, crime and health care is nearly $200 billion. Right now, methamphetamine and heroin are destroying many families and stealing resources we need to educate our kids and make our communities livable and supportive for a growing senior population. We must find alternatives to incarceration and provide adequate treatment and consequences for those who engage in drug abuse. Drug courts, treatment alternatives and even added jail space must be considered. If we continue on our same path, we should not expect a different result.