Denied Real ID Extension Could Mean Long Airport Lines

State officials hope Congress will repeal 2005 law, but security advocate says that’s unlikely

Montanans could face long airport security lines starting in 2018 if the state does not comply with federal driver’s license standards.

In November, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security informed Montana officials the state would not get an extension to comply with the Real ID Act of 2005, which requires state identification cards to meet certain security standards. Montana had received two one-year extensions before, but federal officials told Gov. Steve Bullock it would not receive a third because the state had not made progress toward complying with the standards.

Beginning next month, people using Montana driver’s licenses will not be able to access military bases, nuclear power plants and federal facilities. A year after that, in January 2018, Montanans will be unable to board an airplane using a state-issued driver’s license.

If a resident does not have a passport or other acceptable identification, they would have to fill out a Certification of Identity Form at the airport. The form would ask for the traveler’s name and address and then a Transportation Security Administration agent would call the TSA’s Identity Verification Call Center to gather information about the traveler from various commercial and government databases. The TSA agent would then ask the traveler a series of questions in an effort to independently confirm the person’s identity. If the TSA agent could not confirm the person’s identity, the traveler would not be able to board the plane. Real ID proponents believe the independent verification process will lead to longer lines at airport security.

Montana officials on both sides of the aisle have long railed against the Real ID, saying it was an intrusion of people’s privacy and an overreach by the federal government. In 2007, the state Legislature unanimously voted against complying with the federal law. The American Civil Liberties Union has also come out against the law and previously stated it has a “tremendously destructive impact on privacy.”

Critics specifically worry that the Real ID Act opens the door for the federal government to retain information about private citizens in databases.

“I stand by Montanans and their elected leaders in opposition to the implementation of the Real ID Act, which violates states’ rights and jeopardizes the privacy rights of law-abiding citizens in Montana,” Gov. Steve Bullock said after the feds turned down his request for an extension.

But Andrew Meehan, policy director of Keeping IDentities Safe, said Montana politicians are pushing “myths” about the driver’s license standards that are only going to hurt the state in the long run. According to the Department of Homeland Security, Montana is one of only six states that are not complying with the Real ID laws.

“A shrinking number of states are finding fewer and fewer reasons to hold out on complying with Real ID,” Meehan said. “At some point Montana will be caught between a rock and a hard place.”

Meehan believes many of the criticisms about the Real IDs are unfounded and standardized identification cards offer more security and can prevent people from making fake IDs.

“Ten years after this law came to pass none of these myths have come to fruition. There are not black helicopters hovering above,” he said.

Eric Sell, director of communications for the Montana Department of Justice, said the state hopes Congress would repeal the Real ID Act or change the law so that Montana complies with it. Montana Sen. Steve Daines has said he would introduce legislation to repeal the law in the future.

“We feel that our licenses are secure,” Sell said.

  • geraldcuvillier

    Papers please?

  • taxpayer22

    But mandating voting picture ids, like Mexico uses, is racist.

  • Orion

    So now the real crux begins. We cannot ask voters for a photo ID, but the feds are mandating everybody have one. First it was an unnecessary burden to ask voters for ID. But it is not a burden for the feds to mandate it.
    What do people that do not drive have to provide ? So infants have to comply with what ?

  • Gravelly Joe

    Passed by Republicans….Now they have complete control, should be an easy repeal, right?

  • Ron Fisher

    My new last year DL is so littered with holograms & stuff…I don’t see how anyone could fake a DL from Montana? Its probably better than 1/2 the other states.

  • Rhett the Butler

    From the Editors of the Trib:

    “Full disclosure, we, too, once upon a time opposed the Real ID Act, writing against it in 2008, and even mentioning that by the time Montana’s first extension is up (2009), there will be a new president and a newly constituted Congress.

    Except now that was almost two presidents ago.

    Time has run out. There are no more extensions. And now the residents of Montana have to pay. Passports aren’t cheap; a first-time passport for adults is $135. And that’s an expense Montanans shouldn’t have to pay to travel within the country’s borders.

    So we urge state officials to move on from this battle. You made your point, and that’s
    great, but your stubbornness is about to have real and possibly dire consequences. It’s time to turn your attention elsewhere, and start complying with the Real ID Act.

    The Bozeman Chronicle also editorialized in favor of accepting Real ID.

    As you rightwingnuts like to say, “Freedom isn’t free.”

  • binish

    Start Getting Online income From Home More Than $15k Every month.Very Easy Work For Every one and not required any experience just need a Laptop or PC and internet to do this.Visit this link for details……




  • Ron Woodard

    Our national security is at stake. Only the states will keep their own data and share it with other states when necessary to verify a license in question while one is driving in another state and it will certainly enhance our homeland security. Especially when checking a driver’s license from a driver of another state, a law enforcement officer cannot be expected to know the differences if 50 states are using different security and other driver license features.